Part I of the two-part series explored minor modifications of a Parenting Plan. Part II of this article will explore a major modification of a Parenting Plan under Washington law. A major modification to a parenting plan is just that: asking the court to make a substantial different parenting plan than what the court ordered previously. The law on major
(n) If the court expressly finds based on the evidence that contact between the parent and the child will not cause physical, sexual, or emotional abuse or harm to the child and that the probability that the parent’s or other person’s harmful or abusive conduct will recur is so remote that it would not be in the child’s best interests
This article is part two involving limitations of a parent’s time with their child as stated under RCW 26.09.191. We continue the article by discussing the rebuttable presumption for parents or the person(s) they live with that have been convicted of certain sex offenses. As this is a very technical part of the law, the statute is essentially given to
As a family law/divorce attorney in Vancouver, Clark County, WA, I am frequently asked in the course of my work how to limit the parenting plans for the other parent. Washington law proscribes situations where the parenting time with a child can be limited by the court for a parent. To be clear, these are very limited and specific circumstances
As a family law/divorce attorney in Vancouver, Clark County, WA, I am frequently asked about how someone with a domestic violence history may be treated by the court when in a custody battle, i.e. trying to establish a parenting plan. Well under RCW 26.09.191 proven domestic violence can greatly impact a parent’s time with their child or children in a
In the case of Lyle v. Lyle, Division Three of the Washington State Court of Appeals dealt with the case of a Commissioner’s order that was revised by a Superior Court Judge. Specifically, the court reaffirmed that Superior court judges are authorized to review court commissioner decisions through a motion for revision. Although new evidence may not be considered, a
It is important to know that for family law cases, the filing of a motion for revision does not stay (place on hold) the Commissioner’s order, and the order shall remain in force (effect) unless a separate motion is made to the court and an order staying the Commissioner’s order is granted by the assigned Judge or the Commissioner who
In Clark County, Washington and in many other counties throughout Washington, Superior Court Commissioners handle family law matters routinely. Superior Court Commissioners are not elected judges part are judicial officers hired by the court to decide legal matters as authorized under Washington law. Washington law makes clear that Court commissioners play an important role in the Washington State court system. The
As a Divorce Lawyer, I know divorces can be one of the most emotionally draining events in a person’s life. The court ultimately has the authority to make decisions that can affect everyone involved for the rest of their lives potentially. And of all the things the court can decide in a divorce, one of the most important and contentious
Things to Consider When Getting a Divorce No one enters into a marriage thinking that they are going to get divorced. However, the sad truth is that a significant number of marriages in the United States end in divorce for a variety of reasons. If you are in a situation where divorce becomes a reality, then you need to think
Recent Comments